It's the second Wednesday of the month and so today is the superhero trivia question. I'm taking these from 1001 Comic Book Trivia Questions by Rich Meyer. If you have a problem with the question or answer, it's his fault.
This one is going to be super easy. I even gave you a hint with the picture.
Which famous character's first line was: "Let's face it...you hit the jackpot, Tiger!"
A. Gwen Stacey
B. Mary Jane Watson
C. May Parker
D. Lois Lane
E. None of the Above
Answer in the comments. First one to get it right gets a $5 gift card to Amazon in their email or Facebook. If you aren't first, never fear! One respondent will be selected by random number generator to receive a $1 gift card. Yes, you can give $1 gift cards. Buy yourself a cheap eBook or MP3 or use it to get a dollar off something else. The winner for this will be announced tomorrow. The same person cannot win both gift cards because while that would be more convenient for me it wouldn't really be fair for everyone else.
Also I've decided on what I call the "Andrew Leon Rule" where the same person cannot win the trivia question each month. So if you win this month you won't be eligible to win the $5 for another 3 months (until November). But you can still win the $1 participation prize. Briane Pagel is disqualified for winning July's question and the aforementioned Andrew Leon is disqualified for winning August's.
Good luck!!!
Tomorrow I review Forever Young by Claire Lachance...
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Two-Fer Tuesday #20: Obnoxious Old People
It's Tuesday, which means another Two Fer Tuesday. If you're not acquainted with the rules, I use a random number generator to pick a page and paragraph to pluck two sentences from. Let's see what we get this week.
Page Number: 35
Paragraph Number: 14
Old people can be so annoying....
Emma backed away from the sink so that the old woman could wash her hands. She wanted to leave, but the old woman continued to talk.
Tomorrow is another edition of Superhero Trivia Challenge! By popular vote the question is now at 9AM EST, so better set your alarm...
Paragraph Number: 14
Old people can be so annoying....
Emma backed away from the sink so that the old woman could wash her hands. She wanted to leave, but the old woman continued to talk.
Tomorrow is another edition of Superhero Trivia Challenge! By popular vote the question is now at 9AM EST, so better set your alarm...
Monday, September 10, 2012
Trivial Trivia News
Just a reminder that Wednesday is the next Superhero Trivia question, where you can win $5 or $1 just for commenting! By popular vote the time of the question has moved to 9am EST, so be sure to get up early for it. This month's question is going to be so easy that maybe for once someone can win it within 30 minutes of the question posting.
I was really hoping this morning I could say my publisher had finally put up their new website, which would be a big step to getting my book out there, but sadly there's nothing to report yet. I heard whenever it does get finished they're going to put all their ebooks on sale for 99 cents, so you'll be able to scoop up some bargains. You can keep checking here to see if it ever does go online. And under the Coming Soon you should see Rusty's cover still with no description.
Tomorrow don't expect any of my scintillating comments on your blogs for a while. I'm remembering 9/11 by getting a camera jammed down my esophagus, which requires putting me under for a few hours. After the choking incident I recounted here I've been having trouble swallowing so tomorrow they're going to peek inside and tell me there's nothing wrong and it's all in my head because that's all medical science seems to be good for unless it's something blatantly obvious like I'm gushing blood from a cut on my leg or something. I mean real life medicine is absolutely nothing like House. It's mostly you go to a doctor who sends you to another doctor a few days later who makes you wait a few more days for some stupid test and then you have to go back to the doctor a few more days later to tell you nothing and send you for another test a couple of weeks later and so on and so on. I'm just saying.
Anyway, if through horrific negligence I die on the table the question still posts on Wednesday but you'll need a medium to try and collect your prizes.
Yup it's Monday and I'm tired and grumpy. Damn you Adult Swim for moving Robot Chicken to midnight on Sundays! I should figure out how to get the VCR to work.
I was really hoping this morning I could say my publisher had finally put up their new website, which would be a big step to getting my book out there, but sadly there's nothing to report yet. I heard whenever it does get finished they're going to put all their ebooks on sale for 99 cents, so you'll be able to scoop up some bargains. You can keep checking here to see if it ever does go online. And under the Coming Soon you should see Rusty's cover still with no description.
![]() |
| This is what I will want to do to medical science... |
Anyway, if through horrific negligence I die on the table the question still posts on Wednesday but you'll need a medium to try and collect your prizes.
Yup it's Monday and I'm tired and grumpy. Damn you Adult Swim for moving Robot Chicken to midnight on Sundays! I should figure out how to get the VCR to work.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Guest Post: The Grumpy Bulldog: It's Not Just About ME
With the two political conventions the last two weeks I can't resist doing a political post, despite that I promised myself not to rant about politics on this blog. So sue me. Anyway, it's time now for my alter-ego the Grumpy Bulldog to come out of the doghouse with some political thoughts.
#
During the Republican convention, Mitt Romney and his cronies tried to draw back on that old Reagan line of "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" (This despite that the only similarity between Reagan and Romney is dyeing their hair.) Then the Democrats took up that question and people took to Twitter with hash tags and stuff.
Is the Grumpy Bulldog better off than 4 years ago? NO! I mean besides time's continual march onward making me older, balder, and fatter, I'm not really better off than four years ago. The company I work for is going to be out of business in about two years because the UAW program I work for got axed in the last deal with GM. (Though really we'd probably have been out of business 3 years ago if Romney had gotten his way.)
So obviously I'm not better off than I was at this time in 2008. That means I have to vote for Romney, right? Um, no. See because the problem so many people have in casting their vote is thinking it's only about ME instead of what's good for America as a whole.
Republicans especially love to prey on this selfishness. There's a billboard on I-75 by Detroit that says, "Obama Supports Abortion and Gay Marriage, Do You?--Vote Republican." The implication there is that if you don't like abortion or gay marriage then you have to vote Republican. Which to me is bullshit.
OK, to be honest I don't "like" abortion. I'm not going around screaming, "Wooo, Abortions!!! Yeah, let's kill us some fetuses!!!" But I understand (thanks in large part to The Cider House Rules by John Irving) that it's a complex issue. Banning abortions for everyone just because I personally do not support them is far too simplistic for the world we live in.
As for gay marriage, why the fuck shouldn't we allow it? What, because some book from 2000 years ago maybe says it's bad? The same book that includes incest, rape, and murder to please an invisible entity? The same book where that invisible entity kills a man's family and destroys his life just to win a bet with the devil? Anyway, why should Kim Kardashian be able to marry some guy she barely knows but two guys or two girls who are in love and have known each other forever not be able to get married? How does that make sense? Or to use the somewhat cynical argument from my book Where You Belong, marriage can be fucked up no matter where your genitals are.
Besides that, neither of these issues really affect me personally. I'm not going to get any women knocked up. And I'm sure as hell not ever going to need an abortion. I'm not going to marry any dudes either. So really, why the hell should I vote for someone just because of those issues?
But to get back more to my point, I hate that people do let these kind of issues determine their vote. I especially hate when people think, "I don't like abortion, so no abortions for anyone!" Or "I don't like gays so they can't have the same rights as everyone else!" Who the hell are you to decide that for millions of other people? Get over yourself!
So that's what I'm saying when I talk about it's not just about ME and whether I'm better off or which candidate I think better reflects MY values. It's about who I think is better for everyone in America as a whole. And I think the better guy is the one who's inclusive, rather than the one who's exclusive. Because America is about freedom and if our leaders don't believe in freedom then what the hell good are they?
#
Another thing I wanted to bring up is a little historical nugget I thought of. Back during the onset of the Depression, Herbert Hoover was president. Hoover was a pro-business Republican, which was fine in the Roaring 20s but did shit for America when the stock market tanked and the economy collapsed. Hoover's response to the Depression was largely to do nothing. He touted that Americans' "rugged individualism" would pull them through. Which it obviously didn't, so they elected FDR, who believed the government should take a more active role in the situation, which actually didn't do all that much better.
Anyway, it occurred to me that the whole Tea Party thing is really a return to Hooverism. All this small government stuff they tout is the same "rugged individualism" Hoover championed. That kind of thing might sound great until you lose your job, get evicted from your home, and have to dig through garbage cans for food. Back in 1930-31 or so, people who lost their homes founded tent/shack cities they called Hoovervilles. That's rugged individualism for you. It didn't work in 1932 and it's not going to work in 2012 either.
#
Something else while I'm venting all this stuff is I went on vacation in July up to Petoskey, Michigan. (It's near the top of the mitten.) Driving around I kept seeing these bumper stickers and billboards saying, "Defend Freedom, Vote Against Obama!" To me this is just like the Birther crap, the "Obama 2016" mockumentary, and all these other conspiracy theories floating around. And I think to myself, "What has this man actually DONE to warrant that much hate?"
I mean when you say "Defend Freedom" what freedoms have been infringed in the last 3+ years? Your freedom to go bankrupt should you need a costly operation because you don't have medical insurance? I get so tired of all this paranoid "Manchurian Candidate" crap. He's a Kenyan Muslim! He's a secret Communist! He's an alien parasite from the planet Xenu! Sorry, but there's no actual, factual evidence to support any of that shit. I don't care if you're rich like Donald Trump, you still come off sounding like the paranoid guy wearing a tinfoil hat so the government can't read his thoughts. It's sad then to think these people's vote counts just as much as mine.
Strangely though all these tinfoil hat wearers don't seem to have any problem electing a guy who's a leader in a religion that believes the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, there were white Native Americans before the real Native Americans, God lives on another planet, and all the other crazy hoodoo the Mormons believe. You don't even need a tinfoil hat for that; it's a fact! (Or facts I learned from "South Park" and "Religulous" at least.) Ironically if I went about screaming about that stuff all those tinfoil hat wearers would call me a bigot. Just like if I say they're racist dolts they'd say I'm racist against white people. (That seriously happened in 2008.)
Anyway, I guess the overall point is I wish we lived in a country where people could think rationally and look at the big picture instead of coloring everything with their own prejudices.
Tuesday is still a Two-Fer, not that you care...
#
During the Republican convention, Mitt Romney and his cronies tried to draw back on that old Reagan line of "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" (This despite that the only similarity between Reagan and Romney is dyeing their hair.) Then the Democrats took up that question and people took to Twitter with hash tags and stuff.
Is the Grumpy Bulldog better off than 4 years ago? NO! I mean besides time's continual march onward making me older, balder, and fatter, I'm not really better off than four years ago. The company I work for is going to be out of business in about two years because the UAW program I work for got axed in the last deal with GM. (Though really we'd probably have been out of business 3 years ago if Romney had gotten his way.)
So obviously I'm not better off than I was at this time in 2008. That means I have to vote for Romney, right? Um, no. See because the problem so many people have in casting their vote is thinking it's only about ME instead of what's good for America as a whole.
Republicans especially love to prey on this selfishness. There's a billboard on I-75 by Detroit that says, "Obama Supports Abortion and Gay Marriage, Do You?--Vote Republican." The implication there is that if you don't like abortion or gay marriage then you have to vote Republican. Which to me is bullshit.
OK, to be honest I don't "like" abortion. I'm not going around screaming, "Wooo, Abortions!!! Yeah, let's kill us some fetuses!!!" But I understand (thanks in large part to The Cider House Rules by John Irving) that it's a complex issue. Banning abortions for everyone just because I personally do not support them is far too simplistic for the world we live in.
As for gay marriage, why the fuck shouldn't we allow it? What, because some book from 2000 years ago maybe says it's bad? The same book that includes incest, rape, and murder to please an invisible entity? The same book where that invisible entity kills a man's family and destroys his life just to win a bet with the devil? Anyway, why should Kim Kardashian be able to marry some guy she barely knows but two guys or two girls who are in love and have known each other forever not be able to get married? How does that make sense? Or to use the somewhat cynical argument from my book Where You Belong, marriage can be fucked up no matter where your genitals are.
Besides that, neither of these issues really affect me personally. I'm not going to get any women knocked up. And I'm sure as hell not ever going to need an abortion. I'm not going to marry any dudes either. So really, why the hell should I vote for someone just because of those issues?
But to get back more to my point, I hate that people do let these kind of issues determine their vote. I especially hate when people think, "I don't like abortion, so no abortions for anyone!" Or "I don't like gays so they can't have the same rights as everyone else!" Who the hell are you to decide that for millions of other people? Get over yourself!
So that's what I'm saying when I talk about it's not just about ME and whether I'm better off or which candidate I think better reflects MY values. It's about who I think is better for everyone in America as a whole. And I think the better guy is the one who's inclusive, rather than the one who's exclusive. Because America is about freedom and if our leaders don't believe in freedom then what the hell good are they?
#
Another thing I wanted to bring up is a little historical nugget I thought of. Back during the onset of the Depression, Herbert Hoover was president. Hoover was a pro-business Republican, which was fine in the Roaring 20s but did shit for America when the stock market tanked and the economy collapsed. Hoover's response to the Depression was largely to do nothing. He touted that Americans' "rugged individualism" would pull them through. Which it obviously didn't, so they elected FDR, who believed the government should take a more active role in the situation, which actually didn't do all that much better.
Anyway, it occurred to me that the whole Tea Party thing is really a return to Hooverism. All this small government stuff they tout is the same "rugged individualism" Hoover championed. That kind of thing might sound great until you lose your job, get evicted from your home, and have to dig through garbage cans for food. Back in 1930-31 or so, people who lost their homes founded tent/shack cities they called Hoovervilles. That's rugged individualism for you. It didn't work in 1932 and it's not going to work in 2012 either.
#
Something else while I'm venting all this stuff is I went on vacation in July up to Petoskey, Michigan. (It's near the top of the mitten.) Driving around I kept seeing these bumper stickers and billboards saying, "Defend Freedom, Vote Against Obama!" To me this is just like the Birther crap, the "Obama 2016" mockumentary, and all these other conspiracy theories floating around. And I think to myself, "What has this man actually DONE to warrant that much hate?"
I mean when you say "Defend Freedom" what freedoms have been infringed in the last 3+ years? Your freedom to go bankrupt should you need a costly operation because you don't have medical insurance? I get so tired of all this paranoid "Manchurian Candidate" crap. He's a Kenyan Muslim! He's a secret Communist! He's an alien parasite from the planet Xenu! Sorry, but there's no actual, factual evidence to support any of that shit. I don't care if you're rich like Donald Trump, you still come off sounding like the paranoid guy wearing a tinfoil hat so the government can't read his thoughts. It's sad then to think these people's vote counts just as much as mine.
Strangely though all these tinfoil hat wearers don't seem to have any problem electing a guy who's a leader in a religion that believes the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, there were white Native Americans before the real Native Americans, God lives on another planet, and all the other crazy hoodoo the Mormons believe. You don't even need a tinfoil hat for that; it's a fact! (Or facts I learned from "South Park" and "Religulous" at least.) Ironically if I went about screaming about that stuff all those tinfoil hat wearers would call me a bigot. Just like if I say they're racist dolts they'd say I'm racist against white people. (That seriously happened in 2008.)
Anyway, I guess the overall point is I wish we lived in a country where people could think rationally and look at the big picture instead of coloring everything with their own prejudices.
Tuesday is still a Two-Fer, not that you care...
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Book Review: First Contact by Eric Filler
This is some good old-fashioned space opera, even if it's not particularly well-written. But at 99 cents, how much can you really complain about it? Well if you're some people, a lot. I mean some people complain about a book they got for FREE, the old looking the gift horse in the mouth.
Anyway, the story begins with two starships arriving at an uninhabited planet. (And since this is not "hard" science-fiction there's no explanation of the faster-than-light travel method they use or anything like that.) Captain Lisa Shaw is in command of the expedition, though she feels slighted to be sent out into the middle of nowhere for years on what should be a milk run.
Except things get more interesting than she ever imagined. Not long after the humans arrive and begin surveying the planet, an alien ship appears in the system! Lisa and her crew go through all the standard first contact stuff of trying to send greetings and whatnot, but it soon becomes apparent these aliens are not interested in exchanging messages by musical scales or cave drawings or anything like that.
No, the aliens open fire and within minutes Lisa's ship is destroyed. She's prepared to go down with the ship, but is saved by Ensign Jack Laurants, who assures her she's needed down on the surface. A few others of the bridge crew survive as well, but most of the ship's crew is dead, for which Lisa blames herself.
Not much later on the surface, the human ground soldiers of the expedition come under attack by alien warriors. It's then the alien agenda becomes clear: they want to use the humans as food! Though they aren't carving them up like cattle. The aliens have a much different way of eating, more akin to vampires, though they don't sparkle.
From there the human survivors have to find a way to escape from the aliens and get back to Earth to warn them of the threat.
As I said at the beginning, the writing is not great. It's pretty amateurish and there are of course typographical errors and such. But again it was a dollar, so what are you expecting? The story obviously borrows from a lot of other space opera-type things like Star Wars, Star Trek, Robotech, and maybe a little V--the 80s version. It's a fun light read.
You can buy the book from Amazon here!
Tuesday is another Two-Fer...
Anyway, the story begins with two starships arriving at an uninhabited planet. (And since this is not "hard" science-fiction there's no explanation of the faster-than-light travel method they use or anything like that.) Captain Lisa Shaw is in command of the expedition, though she feels slighted to be sent out into the middle of nowhere for years on what should be a milk run.
Except things get more interesting than she ever imagined. Not long after the humans arrive and begin surveying the planet, an alien ship appears in the system! Lisa and her crew go through all the standard first contact stuff of trying to send greetings and whatnot, but it soon becomes apparent these aliens are not interested in exchanging messages by musical scales or cave drawings or anything like that.
No, the aliens open fire and within minutes Lisa's ship is destroyed. She's prepared to go down with the ship, but is saved by Ensign Jack Laurants, who assures her she's needed down on the surface. A few others of the bridge crew survive as well, but most of the ship's crew is dead, for which Lisa blames herself.
Not much later on the surface, the human ground soldiers of the expedition come under attack by alien warriors. It's then the alien agenda becomes clear: they want to use the humans as food! Though they aren't carving them up like cattle. The aliens have a much different way of eating, more akin to vampires, though they don't sparkle.
From there the human survivors have to find a way to escape from the aliens and get back to Earth to warn them of the threat.
As I said at the beginning, the writing is not great. It's pretty amateurish and there are of course typographical errors and such. But again it was a dollar, so what are you expecting? The story obviously borrows from a lot of other space opera-type things like Star Wars, Star Trek, Robotech, and maybe a little V--the 80s version. It's a fun light read.
You can buy the book from Amazon here!
Tuesday is another Two-Fer...
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Comic Captions 3: Death's Dark Knight
While a lot of other people are spending today whining in their "support group" I prefer to have a little fun. Hence, Comic Captions, where you rewrite the dialog in a panel of a comic book. Pretty easy and fun if you actually try it.
This month's is taken from Azrael #1 (of the 2009 or so series):
Anyway, now you try. Don't be shy, just post the first thing that comes to mind.
Tomorrow I review the space opera First Contact by Eric Filler...
This month's is taken from Azrael #1 (of the 2009 or so series):
And now to get the ball rolling, here's my attempt:
"Tim Tebow ain't shit to me!"
That one probably works better if you know who Tim Tebow is. Just ask Michael Offutt, the Tebow cult initiate. Another Tebow-related one might be: "Sure Tebow circumcized a bunch of babies, but did he do it with a flaming sword? Game, set, match."
Anyway, now you try. Don't be shy, just post the first thing that comes to mind.
Tomorrow I review the space opera First Contact by Eric Filler...
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Two-Fer Tuesday #19: Say My Name
It's Tuesday, which means another Two Fer Tuesday. If you're not acquainted with the rules, I use a random number generator to pick a page and paragraph to pluck two sentences from. Let's see what we get this week.
Page Number: 55
Paragraph Number: 21
Say my name, say my name...
Paragraph Number: 21
Say my name, say my name...
“Just a moment. Did you say your name is Emma Earl?”
Tomorrow is another edition of Comic Captions! Start warming up your funny bones...
Monday, September 3, 2012
Guest Post: Christian Porter: The Art of the Start!
Today we welcome Christian Porter, author of Shadow Precinct! Take it away, Christian!
If you are reading this right now, and you have an idea about writing a story, please stop here and start there. That small idea that you had about zombie dinosaurs isn’t going to write itself and then turn itself into a romantic comedy. I want to impart upon you a very valuable lesson that I learned while trying to write my first novel. You have to commit yourself to the story. It’s an opportunity for you to attempt to convey a vision. You’re watching the story play out in your mind, and you’re trying to take the reader to the place that you’ve created for their imagination. That’s a very cool responsibility to have.
After I had amassed a good amount of background and research material, and created an outline, I started to connect the major plot points with the delicious meat of my story. Mmm. Taste like Soylent Green. Spoiler Alert! It really is a snowball effect when you begin to put idea to paper. It becomes fun to see where the story goes, even more so because it’s fluid. You are in control. Like a lucid dream that actually makes sense. I think you’re onto something when you are genuinely excited to see how the ideas progress and grow. Sometimes it’s in ways that you wouldn’t have expected. That’s the awesome thing about writing.
If you’re anything like me, when you have an idea it has a way of digging deep into your brain and taking root. Embrace that. I’m not saying go into the woods and grow a lumberjack beard in pursuit of inspiration. No one needs you going crazy and asking a grizzly bear what his wi-fi password is (the one called I’z Eats People should have tipped you off). Write a couple lines here and there, describe a setting, come up with some character names. I bet at least one of those takes hold and you begin to write more. And more. And more. And down the creativity rabbit hole we go.
So if you have made it to the closing and aren’t writing the new epic series that tells the tale of robots trapped…in love, then what are you waiting for? I can’t reach through the internet and write down a sentence for you. No one can. Maybe he can, but seriously no one else. You’ve got to take the onus on yourself. Also, use cool words like onus. It’s always extremely beneficial to have a tight circle of folks that encourage you through your process, but never lose sight that this is your creation. You should be excited to let the reader into your world of dreams. Or nightmares. The choice is yours, and that’s why it’s so great.
Thanks, Christian. If you want to buy Shadow Precinct, you can get it from the publisher for $2 off with this coupon code: SPCP201209PROMO
Thanks, Christian. If you want to buy Shadow Precinct, you can get it from the publisher for $2 off with this coupon code: SPCP201209PROMO
Back by no demand tomorrow is Two-Fer Tuesday!
Friday, August 31, 2012
A Rant & A Meme
![]() |
| Initiate Grumpy Bulldog rant!!! |
If I can't even get you people to take free money (or virtually free money) from me then I must really be doing something wrong here. And while occasionally there are some different people who respond, it's mostly the same 4-5 people responding to everything. On top of that I've only gotten one new "follower" in about three months. Though part of that might be people just don't use that widget anymore. I still see it as a prestige thing and wonder why so many other blogs (even ones that barely post) have hundreds of "followers" and I can't even get over 100. Incidentally my Grumpy Bulldog blog still has more "followers" than this one and I haven't posted a new entry there since March 31!
I try to remind myself to be patient. These things take time. Maybe if the book ever gets released that will help drive more people to this site. But I am not a patient man about most things. Like most of America, I want it NOW!!!!
Then I wonder: what do I have to do? As the Joker said through Anthony Michael Hall in The Dark Knight, "What do I have to do to get you people off of the bench and into the game?" I mean, what do you people want to see? At this point I should just start screaming like Maximus in Gladiator, "ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!!"
My philosophy was that I didn't want this to be another boring author's blog. I didn't want to post a bunch of phony baloney writing tips about "show versus tell" and "cures for writer's block" and all that other crap. I mean if you want that I think there are plenty of other blogs doing that and it seemed to me there was no sense in going along with the herd. So I've been trying to do different things, especially with the rotating Wednesday posts. With some like the Comic Captions and the Superhero Trivia I try to be more interactive so people can feel like they're involved with the blog, but as I said even that doesn't seem to rouse a lot of interest.
Anyway, if you want writing tips I can do that. If you want me to talk about TV shows maybe I can start watching those. Or maybe you want more personal stuff like vacation stories and such? I can't promise those would be very interesting. Do you want more rambling, sleep-deprived rants like this?
And I keep harping on this, but I keep these Fridays and Mondays open if you want to do a guest post. You can post whatever the hell you want so long as you keep it clean. I mean if you want to pimp your book or reveal your cover or any of that stuff you're more than free to do so. Though if you want to write a love letter about Mitt Romney or extoll the virtues of the Tea Party I'd probably tell you to take a hike. Otherwise all you have to do is Contact Me by Email or Twitter or just a freaking blog comment and I can set something. I really don't get why more people don't take advantage of that, just like why no one ever asks ME to beta read their book or any of that; are you that intimidated by my awesomeness? (Little joke.)
One thing I'm pretty sure of is you don't want me talking about old Batman comics, so I'm not going to do that for a while. Anything else you want, just let me know because I'm not writing this blog to entertain myself. It's supposed to be to entertain you so you think I'm all cool and witty and want to buy my book. Cha-ching!
Or I can rip off more cute bulldog pictures:
#
Maybe you want me to do more of these stupid "awards" or memes and crap. I find chain letters annoying but people just can't seem to get enough of them. So here you go, here's this "Be Inspired" one I got from Michael Offutt on Wednesday. (There's nothing more inspiring than answering a bunch of questions everyone else is answering!)
I think you're supposed to talk about a book you're writing but I'm sort of between books right now so I'll just make it about the one that should (fingers crossed) be released next month.
- What is the name of your book? A Hero's Journey (see that badge on the right with the cover and saying Coming in September 2012!?)
- Where did the idea for your book come from? This is a long story that began in 2002, though I had tried my hand at other superhero stories back in the 90s without much luck. Anyway, I was actually trying to write a literary story about a TV show focused on a superhero, so I needed to come up with a character and for whatever reason I used The Scarlet Knight. Though in that incarnation the Scarlet Knight was a man (Percival Graves) who I use in the current book as the previous Scarlet Knight. No one of course wanted my wonderful literary novel but I reused the character in a dark, gritty novella that was kind of a modern Don Quixote, something Hollywood has now copied ad nauseum. That also didn't do anything but I kept plugging away and wrote the short story Heart of A Hero in 2008. That was when Emma Earl was introduced, though if you read that story in the Special Features section (did you even know there was a Special Features tab? There is!) you'll see some differences. Really that was more of a Saturday morning cartoon kind of story, at least at the beginning and then it goes all Quantum Leap. Anyway, after my opus Where You Belong, I decided I needed a break from serious stuff and so I reread the Heart of A Hero story and thought, why not make it a novel? Boom!
- In what genre would you classify your book? Speculative Fiction/Urban Fantasy
- Who would you pick to play your characters in a movie adaptation? No idea at this point. I'm not really sure who the "it" girl of the moment is who could do it. Jennifer Lawrence? But she's got all those Hunger Games movies (that they'll probably split now into 7 separate movies each) and other stuff so she might be too busy. As a second choice and because I saw her name earlier I thought of Mia Wasikowska, who was in that Alice in Wonderland movie a couple years ago and also in "Lawless" that's out this weekend. She could probably play a pasty nerd who is still tough enough to beat the shit out of some bad guys when called upon. Though really this kind of question reminds me of "Free Enterprise" where Bill Shatner is discussing who to cast as Calpurnia in his epic six-hour musical of Julius Caesar and he's like "If we can't get Julia Roberts to do it then maybe we could get Sharon Stone (who was still a big deal then). Or maybe Heather Locklear. I know Heather, she's great!" The thing is there has to be a book first and then that book has to be successful enough to sell movie rights and then they have to have enough money to cast any decent actors and in any case I will have absolutely no input on that decision.
- Give us a one sentence synopsis of your book? A young woman finds a suit of magic armor and has to save the world.
- Is your book already published? In theory it should be soon. In theory.
- How long did it take you to write this book? So picking up from question 2, I wrote the first draft in 2009 in like six weeks. And it SUCKED. There were a lot of plot holes it seemed to me. So I regrouped and decided on how I could plug those holes. The second draft then I wrote a few weeks later, and again it probably took six weeks or so. The second draft is narrated by Marlin the ghost, which was fun but had some drawbacks, like how does Marlin know all this other shit going down? It got to be cumbersome. That didn't stop me from plowing ahead with 2 sequels! Then I guess in the winter of 2010 sometime I adapted that into a graphic novel script. That turned out to be pretty long so I cut it down and really if anyone's interested, that's still out there. All I need is someone to draw it. Anyway, about November 2010 I had finished the last of eight books in the series plus a prequel. Then I thought I really ought to go back and redo the first one. So by the end of the year I'd finished what would essentially be the fourth first draft of the story. In spring 2011 I edited it and started sending it out first to agents (who were not interested because she doesn't sparkle or get raped up the ass by some hot guy or whatever). Well I did have one agent ask for a full, which necessitated a lot of last second paring because to try and draw more interest I'd lied and said it was only 85,000 words when it was really 105,000. See the Deleted Scenes to see a lot of what got cut. Anyway, she said it was too weird and passed. So I sent it out to small publishers. I didn't hear anything until January 2012 when the people who are in theory publishing the book accepted it. Then in March I had to turn it in for edits, which I didn't hear anything until May. So I had to make their edits plus I had Mr. Offutt read it and he gave me some stuff to edit. Long story short by the end of June I turned it in. I heard they're having a "proofreader" looking it over before it goes online, so let's hope that person doesn't fuck it up too much. Was that more than you ever wanted to know? Probably.
- What other books in your genre would you compare it to? I've read a couple of superhero-related books. It's not quite like Soon I Will Be Invincible in that there's only one superhero and I'm not trying to parody all the comic book tropes and such. I think it's better than this After the Golden Age book I read where the main character (the daughter of a couple of superheroes) gets kidnapped like six times by the villains in the book. I mean I like to think Emma is a lot smarter than that. But anyway, it would fit somewhere in that genre. Of course I'd love to compare it to the recent Batman movies except my book involves magic armor, ghosts, witches, and a guy who lives in the sewers and talks to rats so there's not that much realism.
- Which authors inspired you to write this book? I think reading Michael Chabon's "Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay" is what made me want to do the literary book in 2002 that led in a circuitous way to this book, so there you go. I think I should note I was not an avid comic book fan so I think that's about the only reason I ever got interested in this subject.
- Tell us anything that might pique our interest in your book. Sex! Wait, there isn't any. Damn it. How about that the Scarlet Knight has lots of neat powers? She can turn invisible, bullets can't hurt her, she can jump really high with her boots, and climb walls with her gloves. And she's got an awesome samurai-type sword that glows and can be remotely controlled by her mind! The Black Dragoon, her mortal foe, is no slouch either. He's got these bad-ass Freddy Krueger claws, except he can shoot them like darts! Or he can make them grow really long to use as a spear. Doesn't that sound totally bad-ass?
Anyway, just to let you know (not that you people seem to pay attention) there might be a Labor Day guest post. If not then there will be another Two-Fer Tuesday whether you want there to be or not.
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Thursday Review: Batman: Venom
It's my last review of Batman Knightfall-related stuff. We've already done Knightfall, Knightsend, Vengeance of Bane, and Azrael, so now I'm going all the way back to what really got things in motion, the Venom miniseries from 1991. You can buy a paperback reprint of this from Amazon or other booksellers. But since it was just as much, I bought the five issues of Legends of the Dark Knight this was featured in online from the DC Comics site. Though it was kind of annoying because unlike other series they don't have the Venom series categorized by a storyline so I only stumbled across them while I was goofing around. That site is fun for looking at the old comics, though there are still a lot of gaps in the older series and some, like Azrael, that don't have much posted. I'm sure they're working on that.
Anyway, so this is kind of a prequel series, which is apparent because Jim Gordon is only a captain (unlike the movies he didn't skip from Lieutenant to Commissioner) and Harvey Dent is not yet Two-Face and only an assistant DA.
When it starts, Batman is searching for a kidnapped girl named Sissy Porter. (What a terrible name.) He finds her in a water pipeline or something but there's a problem: there's been a cave-in that is blocking Batman from reaching the girl and also causing the water to rise. Batman struggles to remove some of the huge chunks of debris out of the way, but he's too weak to get one last piece to move. Sissy ends up drowning while Batman can do nothing. (It's a little contrived to me. I mean usually Batman would have something in his utility belt to shatter the rock, right?)
Batman is a lot more bummed about the girl's death than her father, who is a chemist working on a super-steroid not yet known as Venom. Batman breaks the bad news and then goes to track down the kidnappers to break them. Except he's injured his shoulder from trying to lift the big rock and so ends up getting beat up instead.
That's when he decides to go back to Dr. Porter and get some of the steroids. These give him the strength to beat up the kidnappers with ease. Afterwards he feels so awesome he starts to laugh like a manaic--like the Joker.
From there Batman keeps taking the pills until he starts to look more like Superman. He gets so cocky about his new strength that he starts going around without his costume, instead wearing only a trench coat and fedora when he beats up random bad guys for no real reason. Later we start to see that the Venom has pretty much turned Bruce Wayne into a doltish thug. He's also turned into a junkie, who has to visit Dr. Porter every few weeks or days for his next fix.
Porter and a retired general he's working with figure this is how they can control Batman to do their bidding. Their first assignment is for him to eliminate Captain Gordon, who's been sniffing around their business. In order to get his next fix, Batman agrees.
Except of course he doesn't go through with it. Instead he warns Gordon and then goes to apprehend Porter and the general. When he gets there, though, Porter uses some of the pills to distract Batman long enough to escape.
Having failed to apprehend the criminals, Batman decides it's time to get off the junk. I felt kind of gypped because the description of part 3 says Batman will have to confront his worst nightmares and stuff. Except we don't get to SEE anything. He just locks himself in the Batcave and all we see is Alfred checking the intercom every so often. What a ripoff!
Meanwhile, Porter, the general, and his goofy son Timmy have gone to Santa Prisca, which as you might know by now is where Bane was born and raised in a prison. The junta there have agreed to help Porter with his work. First Porter makes a new, more concentrated formula, this time an injection instead of a pill, so it's pretty much the same stuff Bane uses later on. He uses the general's son as his guinea pig (with the general's permission), turning sweet goofy Timmy into a brute, which seemed like kind of a parody of Captain America's origin story. I mean Timmy could have passed for a taller Steve Rogers before the Venom gets injected.
After spending a month in the Batcave (doing God only knows what) Batman finally emerges and begins getting back into shape so he can go hunt down Porter and the general.
Some time later, Batman and Alfred go down to Haiti and then rent a plane to fly them to Santa Prisca. Meanwhile Dr. Porter and the general have made a squad of Venom-ed-up goons. The general's plan is to take the goons to Africa to whomp on some bad guys to prove to the US government how great Venom is so then he can get his job back. As for Dr. Porter, we learn the reason he didn't show much interest in his daughter dying is because he's hopped up on a different kind of pills, ones to help stimulate his brain while suppressing his emotions.
When Batman and Alfred get near the island, the general shoots down the plane with a missile--guess they won't get that security deposit back. On the way down, Alfred and Batman are separated, landing on different parts of the island. Batman manages to elude capture but Alfred is taken in.
Since they can't find Batman, the general and Porter dangle Alfred from a helicopter and send out a message saying if Batman wants his friend back, he'll have to rescue him from the ocean, at the point where sharks congregate. So a bare-chested Batman goes into the water to save Alfred. He has to fight off some sharks too, which he does by using a broken piece of wood that had been holding Alfred down and...wait for it...shark repellent! Though I don't think the shark repellent came out of his utility belt like in the 1960s Batman "movie" starring Adam West where he was attacked by a plastic shark. Still, talk about jumping the shark!
When they get to the shore, the general sics his son on Batman. In a foreshadowing of Knightfall, Batman is too weakened to defeat the kid. Then Dr. Porter makes the classic villain mistake of keeping Batman alive so he can try to get him hooked back on the Venom.
Of course it would be easy enough at that point to simply inject Batman with the stuff. But it would be much more fun to make it needlessly complicated. So they imprison Batman in a dungeon with a bag of pills. The only way of escape is a door that weighs 800 pounds and soon water will be coming into the cell.
The only way out is to take the Venom, right? Wrong! Instead Batman dips into the "MacGuyver" bag of tricks. Or maybe the "A-Team" whenever they would cobble together some Rube Goldberg stuff to defeat the bad guys.
Once he escapes, Batman finds that the general has turned on Porter. (Another classic villain mistake.) He has Porter tied up and using some special interrogation methods that would make waterboarding seem tame, he extracts the Venom formula from the good doctor so he can make the stuff for himself and keep all the profits.
Batman easily bests the general and manages to keep him from ordering his mindless son to intervene. As revenge, though, Porter uses a tape recording of the general's voice to order the general's son to kill his father. Eventually then Batman takes Porter to Puerto Rico, where Gordon is waiting to bring him in. The End.
Obviously this is more non-essential reading. Though it is interesting if you want to know where the Venom stuff came from that helped make Bane so awesome he could snap Batman like a twig. The last couple of issues descended into traditional comic book plots, which made for a kind of unsatisfying ending. I mean, shark repellent, really? Then the classic villain tropes of keeping the hero alive when it would be much simpler to just kill him. And while they don't come right out and say, "Just Say No" or anything, the anti-drug message is pretty obvious. Drugs are bad, mmmkay?
And obviously I've read and reviewed all this stuff in about the most half-assed way possible, starting with essentially the middle then the end and then going back and back even further. Well, too bad.
Next month I suppose I should lay off the Batman comics and move on to other stuff. I've read a little bit of the New 52 Superman and Action Comics. You know, start with the classics, right? Other suggestions?
Labor Day I might have a guest post (the author hasn't gotten back to me yet) and Tuesday is another Two-Fer...
Anyway, so this is kind of a prequel series, which is apparent because Jim Gordon is only a captain (unlike the movies he didn't skip from Lieutenant to Commissioner) and Harvey Dent is not yet Two-Face and only an assistant DA.
When it starts, Batman is searching for a kidnapped girl named Sissy Porter. (What a terrible name.) He finds her in a water pipeline or something but there's a problem: there's been a cave-in that is blocking Batman from reaching the girl and also causing the water to rise. Batman struggles to remove some of the huge chunks of debris out of the way, but he's too weak to get one last piece to move. Sissy ends up drowning while Batman can do nothing. (It's a little contrived to me. I mean usually Batman would have something in his utility belt to shatter the rock, right?)
Batman is a lot more bummed about the girl's death than her father, who is a chemist working on a super-steroid not yet known as Venom. Batman breaks the bad news and then goes to track down the kidnappers to break them. Except he's injured his shoulder from trying to lift the big rock and so ends up getting beat up instead.
That's when he decides to go back to Dr. Porter and get some of the steroids. These give him the strength to beat up the kidnappers with ease. Afterwards he feels so awesome he starts to laugh like a manaic--like the Joker.
From there Batman keeps taking the pills until he starts to look more like Superman. He gets so cocky about his new strength that he starts going around without his costume, instead wearing only a trench coat and fedora when he beats up random bad guys for no real reason. Later we start to see that the Venom has pretty much turned Bruce Wayne into a doltish thug. He's also turned into a junkie, who has to visit Dr. Porter every few weeks or days for his next fix.
Porter and a retired general he's working with figure this is how they can control Batman to do their bidding. Their first assignment is for him to eliminate Captain Gordon, who's been sniffing around their business. In order to get his next fix, Batman agrees.
Except of course he doesn't go through with it. Instead he warns Gordon and then goes to apprehend Porter and the general. When he gets there, though, Porter uses some of the pills to distract Batman long enough to escape.
Having failed to apprehend the criminals, Batman decides it's time to get off the junk. I felt kind of gypped because the description of part 3 says Batman will have to confront his worst nightmares and stuff. Except we don't get to SEE anything. He just locks himself in the Batcave and all we see is Alfred checking the intercom every so often. What a ripoff!
Meanwhile, Porter, the general, and his goofy son Timmy have gone to Santa Prisca, which as you might know by now is where Bane was born and raised in a prison. The junta there have agreed to help Porter with his work. First Porter makes a new, more concentrated formula, this time an injection instead of a pill, so it's pretty much the same stuff Bane uses later on. He uses the general's son as his guinea pig (with the general's permission), turning sweet goofy Timmy into a brute, which seemed like kind of a parody of Captain America's origin story. I mean Timmy could have passed for a taller Steve Rogers before the Venom gets injected.
After spending a month in the Batcave (doing God only knows what) Batman finally emerges and begins getting back into shape so he can go hunt down Porter and the general.
Some time later, Batman and Alfred go down to Haiti and then rent a plane to fly them to Santa Prisca. Meanwhile Dr. Porter and the general have made a squad of Venom-ed-up goons. The general's plan is to take the goons to Africa to whomp on some bad guys to prove to the US government how great Venom is so then he can get his job back. As for Dr. Porter, we learn the reason he didn't show much interest in his daughter dying is because he's hopped up on a different kind of pills, ones to help stimulate his brain while suppressing his emotions.
When Batman and Alfred get near the island, the general shoots down the plane with a missile--guess they won't get that security deposit back. On the way down, Alfred and Batman are separated, landing on different parts of the island. Batman manages to elude capture but Alfred is taken in.
Since they can't find Batman, the general and Porter dangle Alfred from a helicopter and send out a message saying if Batman wants his friend back, he'll have to rescue him from the ocean, at the point where sharks congregate. So a bare-chested Batman goes into the water to save Alfred. He has to fight off some sharks too, which he does by using a broken piece of wood that had been holding Alfred down and...wait for it...shark repellent! Though I don't think the shark repellent came out of his utility belt like in the 1960s Batman "movie" starring Adam West where he was attacked by a plastic shark. Still, talk about jumping the shark!
When they get to the shore, the general sics his son on Batman. In a foreshadowing of Knightfall, Batman is too weakened to defeat the kid. Then Dr. Porter makes the classic villain mistake of keeping Batman alive so he can try to get him hooked back on the Venom.
Of course it would be easy enough at that point to simply inject Batman with the stuff. But it would be much more fun to make it needlessly complicated. So they imprison Batman in a dungeon with a bag of pills. The only way of escape is a door that weighs 800 pounds and soon water will be coming into the cell.
The only way out is to take the Venom, right? Wrong! Instead Batman dips into the "MacGuyver" bag of tricks. Or maybe the "A-Team" whenever they would cobble together some Rube Goldberg stuff to defeat the bad guys.
Once he escapes, Batman finds that the general has turned on Porter. (Another classic villain mistake.) He has Porter tied up and using some special interrogation methods that would make waterboarding seem tame, he extracts the Venom formula from the good doctor so he can make the stuff for himself and keep all the profits.
Batman easily bests the general and manages to keep him from ordering his mindless son to intervene. As revenge, though, Porter uses a tape recording of the general's voice to order the general's son to kill his father. Eventually then Batman takes Porter to Puerto Rico, where Gordon is waiting to bring him in. The End.
Obviously this is more non-essential reading. Though it is interesting if you want to know where the Venom stuff came from that helped make Bane so awesome he could snap Batman like a twig. The last couple of issues descended into traditional comic book plots, which made for a kind of unsatisfying ending. I mean, shark repellent, really? Then the classic villain tropes of keeping the hero alive when it would be much simpler to just kill him. And while they don't come right out and say, "Just Say No" or anything, the anti-drug message is pretty obvious. Drugs are bad, mmmkay?
And obviously I've read and reviewed all this stuff in about the most half-assed way possible, starting with essentially the middle then the end and then going back and back even further. Well, too bad.
Next month I suppose I should lay off the Batman comics and move on to other stuff. I've read a little bit of the New 52 Superman and Action Comics. You know, start with the classics, right? Other suggestions?
Labor Day I might have a guest post (the author hasn't gotten back to me yet) and Tuesday is another Two-Fer...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







