Most of us think of self-publishing as only books with words, but self-published comic books and graphic novels are a growing industry as well. Most of the artists and writers who work for Marvel and DC's big titles also have their own "creator-owned" books with smaller publishers.
Un-American Chronicles is a new self-published series. The first issue was only 99 cents, so I decided to pick it up and read it. Despite being self-published, this is just as good as most mainstream titles, and better than many self-published ones I bought in a bundle a couple of years ago. The art drawn by Juan Alarcón and colored by Carolina Bensler has a slightly different style for each of the five segments while the stories by Arcadio Bolaños vary in genres.
The first story "The Outsider" is more of a horror piece like the Stephen King story "The Body" that was made into the movie Stand By Me. In this case three boys find a bank robber in a well and after they decide to leave her, they're haunted by presumably her evil spirit.
The next story is a drama about a boy who takes on a bully while at the same time his father is in one of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11.
The third story is a humorous little yarn about a guy who keeps rejecting the advances of gorgeous women, not realizing these women all share a secret.
There are two more stories that are only a page apiece but they promise to be continued.
That's a lot of stuff going on for 23 pages. Much more than you get in the standard superhero comic these days, most of which is punching and stuff. Far less punching in this.
For 99 cents it's a really good value and hopefully the start of a great new series. Buy it from Comixology and you can read it on your PC, tablet, phone, or whatever.
You can also visit the author's blog here for comic reviews written in English and Spanish. (Which is impressive since I can barely do them in one language.)
Showing posts with label Guest Posts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest Posts. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
Monday, March 30, 2015
On Literary Criticism
This is an accompaniment to my sign-off piece on Indie Writers Monthly today. This is a story I wrote 11 years ago about an "honest" online book reviewer who gets a chance to meet one of the people whose book he's trashed. His "integrity" winds up being betrayed by his secondary brain. It's called "Carnal Knowledge" and you can find it as part of The Carnival Papers, my collection of literary short stories, on sale in paperback and ebook format on Amazon or FREE to read online on Wattpad.
Code of Heaven by Susan Witherbee is without a doubt the worst book I have ever read. The story—if this jumbled mess can be considered a story—is told through a series of random flashbacks that confounded me as the reader and kept me from ever getting into the book. Each flashback provides little more than a sketch of an event to confirm its existence rather than enlighten the reader on its significance; I would have preferred four or five detailed sequences instead of the half-baked scattershot approach the author uses.
The characters are as flat and dull as the paper the novel is printed on. Witherbee is more concerned with describing what the characters are wearing or what music they listen to than with what they think and feel. Joshua, the “hero” of the story, is so morally bankrupt that I anxiously awaited for his inevitable, not tragic, death. Sarah, Joshua’s love interest, comes off as a whiny, pampered princess whose sole function is to pine after Joshua and nurse him on occasion. As for the secondary characters, they were little more than sounding boards, extras, and cheerleaders; none of them had any personality to speak of.
The author’s prose is a mockery to anyone who appreciates real literature; I’m amazed an editor let this horrid trash out the door. Of course it helps that her father is CEO for the world’s largest chemical company—my very own Herbert Chemical. I’m sure a few briefcases full of cash helped to grease the wheels of the printing presses; what else can explain how such a travesty managed to infiltrate the bookshelves?
Even as I write this, Witherbee is already shooting up the bestseller list and looking for a buyer for the movie rights. No doubt she’ll ask Daddy to get her the starring role. I implore anyone reading this review not to encourage a spoiled brat playing at being an author; do not aid and abet the further decline of American literature.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
Dante
Randall hit the last key with a flourish and leaned back in his rickety wooden
office chair. How fitting that the review
to put him over the top was directed at his most hated enemy. If only he could get her to read it and see
the look on her face, the humiliation would be priceless to watch. In the semi-darkness of his basement lair,
Dante imagined Susan Witherbee bursting into a fit of tears as she read his
review.
While
he loaded the review to the BookBurners Web site, Dante considered where to
file his copy of Code of Heaven. The three rotting bookcases on the wall to
his left, adjacent to the hot water heater, comprised his ‘Keepers’—the books
he deemed worthy to retain. Next to the
bookshelves, a pair of dilapidated cardboard boxes, still smelling of the
laundry detergent they had once contained, served as the final resting place
for those books he would eventually sell to Steve’s Discount Book Shop to fund
his future purchases. Dante wasted
little time in tossing Witherbee’s book in one of the cardboard boxes. He turned back to his ancient computer and
logged in to the BookBurners home page.
As
soon as he copied the text of his review into the form and hit the Submit
button, he became the site’s top reviewer.
In five years Dante—under the pseudonym Book Justice—had reviewed five
hundred books, just one more than his long-time nemesis Sir Readsalot. Like Susan Witherbee, Dante imagined the
enigmatic Readsalot would burst into tears when he realized he had lost his
title at last.
His
mother spoiled his moment of triumph by calling down the stairs, “Dante, take
out the trash!”
“In
a couple minutes, Ma,” he shouted back.
He scrolled through the BookBurners site to read the other reviews of Code of Heaven, most by amateur hacks
who couldn’t string together a single sentence.
No one—the mighty Sir Readsalot included—rivaled Dante’s combination of
analytical skill, writing knowledge, and sharp wit. The other reviewers all hailed Code of Heaven as “brilliant”, “bold”,
and “amazing” while crowning Susan Witherbee as, “a powerful new voice in
American literature” and “the reigning queen of the literary world”.
The
adulation came as no surprise to Dante.
The masses cared only for entertainment, for a book to keep their feeble
minds occupied during a long flight or a day at the beach. They were a mob easily amused by a shiny new
toy, until they grew tired of it and looked for something else to entertain
them. Susan Witherbee was the woman of
the moment, but the public’s love for her would fade quickly, as Dante’s had.
He
remembered the day he had fallen under Witherbee’s spell, his first day at
Freepoint Central High School. Back then
he was a three-hundred-pound geek with long, greasy hair concealing his zit-ravaged
face; his wardrobe consisted solely of heavy metal T-shirts that showed off his
gut if he raised his arms and elastic waistband pants with crotches that would
wear out after two months of use. In
junior high, he had been a nerd even amongst the nerds—no one wanted to commit
social suicide by befriending him. High
school gave him a new lease on life, a second chance to make friends.
Everyone
at Freepoint Central wanted to be Susan Witherbee’s friend. She was a senior, homecoming queen, head cheerleader,
and student council president. She
always traveled with a phalanx of cronies and admirers surrounding her. Every male—including the teachers—saw her in
his dreams, hovering naked in his mind’s eye like Botticelli’s Venus.
The
moment Dante had seen her, he underwent his first sexual experience. He had been waddling down the hallway to his
first class when she came gliding towards him, surrounded by her loyal court of
fellow cheerleaders. The other students
parted before her like the Red Sea, and though he was too new to know who she
was, he understood the reaction of his peers made her someone important. As she approached, Dante froze in his tracks
and gaped at her breathtaking beauty.
Her golden hair trailed behind her like a cloud, her breasts bulged
against her blue-and-white cheerleader sweater, and her skirt gave him a full
view of her long, athletic legs. When
she turned her emerald eyes on him, the blood drained from his face and a
strange, unfamiliar surge of emotion flooded through him.
Her
eyes went wide when she saw him and she put a pale, delicate hand to her
mouth. From her full, red lips came a
sound like the twitter of a songbird—a laugh.
The other girls in her entourage joined in the laughter and Dante
wondered what they found so funny. Then
he looked down and saw the bulge in his pants peeking out over the rim of his
gut.
In
the moment he had first laid eyes on her, Dante had loved Susan Witherbee as
the public now did. It was only in the
sanctuary of a bathroom stall after dropping his books and running away with
the sound of her laughter ringing in his ears that he understood what Susan
Witherbee was. She was a Siren calling
to him with her beauty, only to send his heart crashing onto the rocks. In an instant, she had driven him mad with
desire and destroyed his life at Freepoint Central before it had begun.
That
was the day Dante Randall became known around the school as “Boner” for his
accidental sexual transgression. He
lumbered down the halls with snickers, catcalls, and cries of “Keep it in your
pants!” trailing in his wake. Susan
Witherbee’s delicate laugh had made Dante an untouchable and turned his four
years at Freepoint Central into a nightmare.
She had never once apologized to him or encouraged others to go easy on
him. With her popularity and prestige,
she could have ended all the abuse by showing some compassion towards him, but
after he so unceremoniously ran away that first day, he had never seen or heard
from her again.
In
the bathroom stall, Dante had learned what the public soon would—underneath the
beauty and behind the money was a selfish, spoiled brat who cared for no one
but herself. She had enjoyed his
humiliation, relished his embarrassment, and savored his abuse. Once the masses began to know her like he
did, then they would turn against her.
Then he would have his revenge.
“Dante,
take out the trash! It’s stinking up the
house,” his mother shouted down the stairs.
He shook his head and snagged his parka from the nail where it hung
before stomping up the steps into the kitchen.
He muttered a stream of obscenities as he hefted the trash bag from the
can and tied it up. If she hated the
smell so much, why didn’t she just take the garbage out instead of screaming at
him?
He
committed a minor act of defiance by taking the stinking bag through the living
room, where his bovine mother sprawled on the tattered sofa and watched a soap
opera. “About time,” she growled at his
appearance and blew a cloud of smoke in his direction; Dante exaggerated a hacking
cough before he opened the door.
The
bitter January air struck him like a thousand tiny needles poking his flesh; in
his anger and annoyance at his mother, Dante had forgotten to don the hat and
gloves necessary for the brutal arctic trek to the curb. He hurried as fast as he dared on the icy
driveway, transferring the garbage bag from one hand to the other so he could
keep his free hand in the pocket of his parka, a gesture that provided minimal
protection against the cold. In such
conditions, he found himself longing for the insulation his fat had once provided. By the time he dumped the bag on the curb,
his nose had gone numb and his teeth were clicking out their own Morse
code. As he skidded back along the ice
of the driveway, he saw a hint of blue plastic peeking from the snowdrift that
in warmer months served as his mother’s unsuccessful flowerbed.
Why
couldn’t the paperboy ever land the newspaper within a five-foot radius of the
front door? Dante wondered and tiptoed his way through the snow with both hands
firmly stuffed into his pockets. He
reached out to pull the bag free from its wintry cage and tucked it under his
arm before running to the front door with his head down and shoulders lowered
against the wind like a fullback. Then
at last he reached the door and threw himself inside, where the warmth from the
furnace washed over his shivering body.
He
stood in the doorway for a long time, the feeling returning to his extremities
gradually, before he remembered the newspaper under his arm. Dante pulled the morning edition of The Freepoint Daily News from its
wrapper and shook out the cold pages.
His mother subscribed to the newspaper solely for the obituaries,
wedding announcements, and crime stories so she would have plenty of ammunition
when gossiping with her friends on the phone later. Dante rarely took interest in the local
newspaper—he planned to subscribe to The
New York Times when he got the money—but today as he glanced at the front
page, the headline chilled him more than the weather outside. ‘Local Author Tops Bestseller List,’ the
headline boasted and without reading further, Dante knew to whom it referred.
The
article was a one-column story documenting Susan Witherbee’s rise to the top of
the bestseller list—it told him little he didn’t already know—but more
surprising was the teaser for an exclusive interview with the author in the
Arts section. Dante pawed through the
newspaper and threw the other sections at his mother’s feet before running
downstairs with the Arts section of the newspaper. Under the dim light of a single bare bulb,
Dante’s anger boiled.
When
asked why she had decided to write a book, Witherbee replied, “I wanted to
write something that would really affect people’s lives.” Code of
Heaven had only affected Dante’s life by stoking the coals of his anger for
what she had done to him and to the literary world in general. He laughed when she answered a question about
her literary influences with, “I’ve always read a lot of books. When I was a kid, I read every Nancy Drew
book.” He doubted she’d advanced much
past Nancy Drew mysteries. He snorted as
he read her response to why her book had become a bestseller. “I don’t really know. You’ll have to ask the fans.”
The
last comment provided the interviewer with the perfect segue into mentioning
that Witherbee would be signing copies of her bestseller at the Barnes and
Noble in the Freepoint Mall today from two to four o’clock. Dante checked his watch; the signing would
start in two hours. He leaned back and glanced
at his computer screen. He remembered
his earlier vision of Susan Witherbee bursting into tears as she read his
review of her work; now he had the opportunity to see her reaction in person. In front of the teeming mass of her fans, he
could expose her as the literary fraud he knew her to be and hasten the
public’s disenchantment. “I’ll do it,”
he announced and shot to his feet.
Dante
scampered upstairs and raced down the hall to his bedroom. From the depths of his closet, he pulled out
the dark blue suit reserved for weddings and funerals in addition to a starched
white shirt and black tie. After
delivering his justice to Witherbee, he would have to change before his shift
at Little Caesars, but he wanted to look as prosperous and respectable as possible
when he tore her apart.
While
he took a brief shower, Dante hummed “Ride of the Valkyries” at the top of his
lungs in anticipation of the apocalypse awaiting Susan Witherbee. She would rue the day she had laughed at him
in the hallway of Freepoint Central; he would inflict the same humiliation on
her that he had endured that day. This
time she would be the one running to the bathroom in tears to find consolation
among the cold, vacant stalls.
After
he hopped out of the shower, he stood in front of the mirror; Susan Witherbee
would not recognize him anymore. Puberty
and more restrictive eating habits had shrunk his waistline to where only the
slightest bulge remained. He kept his
hair at military length and washed it often enough to keep it from becoming
greasy. His skin had cleared, although
it was a sickly shade of white from too many afternoons spent reading in the
basement. He was a whole new
person—strong, confident, and ready to destroy his hated enemy.
He
resumed humming as he strode down the hall with a swagger in his step. “Where are you going?” his mother demanded
without bothering to look away from the television screen. “You got a date or something?”
“Yeah,
I got a date,” Dante mumbled. A date
with destiny, he thought. The cold wind
slammed into him again as he opened the door and stepped outside. He put his head down and skittered to his
ice-encrusted silver Nova. The engine
sputtered to life and the defroster wheezed before spewing a thin stream of
warm air. Dante didn’t have time to wait
for the car to warm up; he scraped away enough frost from the windshield to see
and pulled out of the driveway.
Blanketed
in ice and snow, the crumbling manufactured homes of Ridgewood Manors looked
like the ruins of some post-apocalyptic wasteland. The bleakness of the scene usually filled
Dante with despair and a longing to escape to a warmer, more inviting climate,
but today nothing could faze his high spirits.
He had waited a decade for the chance to pay back Susan Witherbee for
what she had done to him, for how she had ruined his life. Now, on this frosty winter day, Fortune had
laid the opportunity right into his lap.
Dante’s
humming reached a fevered pitch as he passed under the mammoth cement struts of
I-775 and saw the Freepoint Mall to his right.
The mall called to him like a glittering white beacon awaiting his visit
to dispense the justice he had long craved.
He pulled into the parking lot and skated down the rows of cars with his
head held high in defiance to the wind; a power he had never known before
coursed through his veins to fill him with an inner strength. By the time he reached the heavy wooden doors
of the Barnes and Noble, he had labeled the mysterious emotion welling up
inside of him—hatred.
When
he yanked the doors opened, he found himself thrust into a tide of humanity
running the length of the store. The
great multitude—some clutching copies of
Code of Heaven—chatted and fidgeted as they waited in line. A hefty young mother stood in front of Dante
and obstructed his view of everything save for the wide expanse of her back and
bulbous rear end. The woman’s two
daughters, who had the same short brown hair and chubby frame of their mother,
yanked on the sleeve of her winter coat.
“Mommy, we want to look at toys,” one of the girls whined.
“You
promised,” her sister added.
“We’ll
go to the toy store after I’m done here.
Now stop bothering me,” the woman snapped. The little girls jumped back as though she
had slapped them and their faced turned red as tears formed in their eyes. Dante took a step backward—he didn’t want
anyone to mistake him for the father of the poor children—and held his
tongue. He wanted to assure the horrible
woman that Susan Witherbee’s signature was no great prize, but he couldn’t risk
making a scene and getting thrown out of the store before he delivered his
message. As if she sensed Dante’s
disgust, the woman patted her girls on the head and said sweetly, “Why don’t
you two go look at all the pretty picture books?” Her daughters nodded and staggered away with
their heads down like scolded puppies.
Dante
shook his head and immersed himself in his hatred of Susan Witherbee. He recited his review over and over again in
his mind until he could say it verbatim, as he would when he got to the head of
the line. He paid little attention as
the flood of Witherbee’s fans ground its way through the aisles of the bookstore,
and before he knew it, he had neared his goal.
A heavy wooden table swathed in a blue tablecloth that shamelessly
matched the cover of Code of Heaven
was stacked with copies of the book.
Blocked by the big woman ahead of him and the other fans, Dante could
only make out an elderly gentleman on the right, who Dante decided was either
Witherbee’s agent or father.
Then
he heard her voice for the first time.
It had the same sweet, melodic pitch as the laugh that had tormented him
for a decade. “Thank you very much,” she
said. “I’m glad you loved the book.”
He
was tempted to peek around the big mother in front of him, but he didn’t want
to call attention to himself; this was supposed to be an ambush after all. The woman ahead of Dante stepped forward and
said, “I really liked the book, Ms. Witherbee.
It was so beautiful.”
“Thank
you, that means a lot,” Witherbee replied.
Dante detected the undercurrent of boredom in her voice; no doubt she
had heard the same praise a thousand times before. The woman took her signed copy of the book
and pulled away to give Dante a good look at his mortal enemy for the first
time.
He
froze in his tracks and traveled back in time to the hallway of Freepoint
Central. He was again the rotund nerd
gawking at her unparalleled beauty. She
looked almost the same as he remembered, except that her hair was cut shorter
and she’d gained just enough weight to give her a more curvaceous, womanly figure. Her still-firm breasts pressed against the
fabric of her tight pink blouse—she was not wearing a bra—and a pale, ringless
hand went to her lips. The blood drained
from Dante’s face and a now-familiar surge of emotion ran through him.
She
laughed the same songbird twitter as she had ten years ago.
Dante
looked down and saw the bulge against the blue fabric of his pants. All the words he had rehearsed, all the
hatred he had felt, drained away into oblivion.
Time stopped around him and he heard only the familiar sound of her
laughter ringing in his ears. He met her
eyes for a moment and saw nothing but scorn and amusement in them.
Dante
turned and bolted away as he had ten years earlier.
He
ran through the aisles of the Barnes and Noble, frantically seeking to find
somewhere to hide. As he flew through
the store, he heard the old snickers, catcalls, and a cry of “Hey buddy, keep
it in your pants!” When he neared the
entrance to the children’s section of the store, he had to stop to avoid
running down the woman who had been standing in front of him in line and her
two daughters.
“Mommy,
what’s wrong with that man?” one of the girls asked.
The
woman’s eyes swelled and she turned her children away. “It’s nothing,” she replied and frantically
shoved them towards the checkout. Dante
looked down at his pants and saw the stubborn bulge was still there. Before anyone else took notice of him, he
sprinted ahead and mercifully found the bathroom, where he locked himself in an
immaculate hunter green stall.
Nothing
had changed. He had changed his outward
appearance so that he longer looked like the fat geek she had laughed at in the
hallway of Freepoint Central, but inside he was still the same. All this time his heart and his mind had lied
to him, but his most primitive piece of anatomy could not be so easily
fooled. It had known all along that the
love he felt for Susan Witherbee had never evaporated. While his mind conjured clever reviews and
scenarios of vengeance, his penis had followed the primal instinct programmed
into it through millions of years of evolution.
#
There are no reader comments today. If you liked this story, why not go buy the whole collection using the links above?
See you Wednesday for the A to Z Challenge!
Labels:
Guest Posts
Friday, October 5, 2012
The Grumpy Bulldog: Strategery!
Lately I've been watching "Breaking Bad" on Netflix--I'm into Season 4 now, which leaves like 1+ seasons left--and what I've found is the family drama parts of the show are so boring to me. I like it a lot better when they're making meth or trying to outwit cops and other dealers. Now part of that might have to do with it's more exciting when there's gunfights or killing someone with a bike lock or a Pontiac Aztek, but then I got thinking that what I really like is those are the parts that involve more strategy.
Hannibal on the A-Team used to say, "I love it when a plan comes together" and I think I like watching a plan come together. That would explain why I like those parts of "Breaking Bad" and also crime movies like "The Godfather" and heist movies and even revenge movies. They all involve a lot of planning and often intricate scheming in order to accomplish whatever the goal is.
Maybe that's not all that surprising because my favorite video games are strategy games like "Conflict" for the NES and "Age of Empires" for the PC. I'm also fascinated with tracking box office numbers though I don't bother to go to many movies, which again I think is just that I like to follow which strategies pay off and which don't. Maybe that's why I like baseball too. I think it extends to writing as well because I often find the planning of a story to be more fun than the actual writing of the story. It's fun for me anyway to figure out how things will fit together. Some stories I think I end up abandoning because they were a lot more fun planning out on paper than they were to actually write, or the high concept sounds great but getting into all the gory bits proves to be too cumbersome.
Anyway, the odd thing is that I have no affinity for puzzles and I don't read many mysteries either. Though in the last year or so I got more into noir detective stories, perhaps for the reasons I describe. I don't think "cozy" mysteries would interest me as much; not enough violence and action. I did read a lot of military fiction like Tom Clancy and stuff back in my younger days.
There you go, a little Friday rambling. After I've watched the whole series I'll probably do a full "Breaking Bad" entry plus should my book ever get published I have a guest post for Michael Offutt's blog comparing Walter White and the Black Dragoon of my book. That will be fascinating I'm sure.
The far more important thing is I can finally announce Neil Vogler, Sean Craven, and I have signed on to do a project with December House Publishing. More details will follow over the next few weeks. It's sad they already have my bio up. The publisher of A Hero's Journey? Not so much.
Monday's Phony Photos is one for the ladies...
Hannibal on the A-Team used to say, "I love it when a plan comes together" and I think I like watching a plan come together. That would explain why I like those parts of "Breaking Bad" and also crime movies like "The Godfather" and heist movies and even revenge movies. They all involve a lot of planning and often intricate scheming in order to accomplish whatever the goal is.
Maybe that's not all that surprising because my favorite video games are strategy games like "Conflict" for the NES and "Age of Empires" for the PC. I'm also fascinated with tracking box office numbers though I don't bother to go to many movies, which again I think is just that I like to follow which strategies pay off and which don't. Maybe that's why I like baseball too. I think it extends to writing as well because I often find the planning of a story to be more fun than the actual writing of the story. It's fun for me anyway to figure out how things will fit together. Some stories I think I end up abandoning because they were a lot more fun planning out on paper than they were to actually write, or the high concept sounds great but getting into all the gory bits proves to be too cumbersome.
Anyway, the odd thing is that I have no affinity for puzzles and I don't read many mysteries either. Though in the last year or so I got more into noir detective stories, perhaps for the reasons I describe. I don't think "cozy" mysteries would interest me as much; not enough violence and action. I did read a lot of military fiction like Tom Clancy and stuff back in my younger days.
There you go, a little Friday rambling. After I've watched the whole series I'll probably do a full "Breaking Bad" entry plus should my book ever get published I have a guest post for Michael Offutt's blog comparing Walter White and the Black Dragoon of my book. That will be fascinating I'm sure.
The far more important thing is I can finally announce Neil Vogler, Sean Craven, and I have signed on to do a project with December House Publishing. More details will follow over the next few weeks. It's sad they already have my bio up. The publisher of A Hero's Journey? Not so much.
Monday's Phony Photos is one for the ladies...
Friday, September 21, 2012
Guest Post: The Grumpy Bulldog: Political Deja Vu
The Grumpy Bulldog is doing another guest post, mostly because I'm bored. A couple weeks ago when I talked politics there was one thing I left out and what's happened with the Romney campaign this week helps to back up my thinking.
What this 2012 election for president is reminding me a lot of, especially lately, is the Michigan gubernatorial race back in 2006. Long before the economy tanked in the rest of the country the economy in Michigan had already gone down the tubes. Because of this, the governor at the time--Democrat Jennifer Granholm--wasn't all that popular. Besides the economy, being a woman probably didn't help just like being half-black doesn't help Obama with a lot of voters.
Going into the election it seemed to me it should be a slam-dunk for the Republicans. I mean the economy is in the crapper and governor's approval ratings aren't great and about the only accomplishment she could cite is setting up a "Cool Cities" initiative. Even though Michigan is traditionally a "blue state" with the unions and such it had been in Republican hands from 1990-2002, so a return to that seemed likely.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, the guy who bought the party's nomination that year was Dick de Vos. You can make a lot of comparisons between de Vos and Mitt Romney. While both have a connection to the state and both are successful businessmen, they both have the charisma of Kristen Stewart--which is to say none at all. While Romney has the whole Mormon thing people don't talk about too loudly but you know is in the back of their minds, de Vos's handicap is that his successful business was Amway.
A lot of de Vos's energy then was spent defending Amway in the same way Romney's had to spend energy defending his Bain Capital days. Exporting jobs to China was a big thing in both cases.
Anyway, between the lack of relatability because of his wealth and lack of natural charm and the whole Amway connection, what should have been a slam-dunk became a fairly large loss. I think it boiled down to while people didn't like Granholm, the alternative wasn't any better.
For my part I decided to just wash my hands of the whole thing. I voted for the Libertarian candidate because I didn't like Granholm but I didn't like de Vos either. So screw 'em both was my thought. Then no matter who won I could still complain about it, right?
The point of this is that I think a lot of the same thing is happening nationally in 2012. A lot of people don't really like the job Obama is doing (I am not one of those) but they don't see the alternative as any better. I read in a Yahoo! article that 75% of people surveyed found Romney unrelatable, versus 60% for Obama. So obviously Americans don't like either guy all that much but they dislike Romney more for all the reasons I gave above.
The "47% speech" that came out this week has not helped the situation for the Romney camp. When people already think you're a rich snob it's not good to get caught calling 47% of the country a bunch of freeloaders.
Unlike some pundits I don't think the 47% video is going to sink Romney right away, but it's just another piece of a damning puzzle of failure. It's part of the likability issue that is going to continue to plague him no matter how many diners he goes to without a tie and how often he has his wife say nice things about him. In the end politics in the 21st Century are as much about image as anything, something that helped Obama the first time and George W in 2000 and 2004 and it's really hard to change your image with seven weeks left to go.
Just as an addendum it's kind of funny that while de Vos lost in 2006 the next Michigan governor, Rick Snyder, had a lot of the same attributes, except no connection to Amway. But what he did right was to start off with the goofy "It's Time for a Nerd" commercials in 2010. Those were kind of funny and helped him avoid the likability pitfall de Vos fell into, even though I don't think Snyder is any more charismatic. Showing a sense of humor would probably help Romney more in these final weeks. And maybe do a tearful interview on Fox "News" about whatever trauma a rich white guy faces. "And then I found out the wine was only from 1965, not 1905, boo hoo hoo!" "And then I realized the maid had shrunk my silk boxers right before the horse show, sob sob sob!"
Here, I'm going to reassure Michael Offutt about who I'm voting for:
Monday is still more Phony Photo Phun...
What this 2012 election for president is reminding me a lot of, especially lately, is the Michigan gubernatorial race back in 2006. Long before the economy tanked in the rest of the country the economy in Michigan had already gone down the tubes. Because of this, the governor at the time--Democrat Jennifer Granholm--wasn't all that popular. Besides the economy, being a woman probably didn't help just like being half-black doesn't help Obama with a lot of voters.
Going into the election it seemed to me it should be a slam-dunk for the Republicans. I mean the economy is in the crapper and governor's approval ratings aren't great and about the only accomplishment she could cite is setting up a "Cool Cities" initiative. Even though Michigan is traditionally a "blue state" with the unions and such it had been in Republican hands from 1990-2002, so a return to that seemed likely.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, the guy who bought the party's nomination that year was Dick de Vos. You can make a lot of comparisons between de Vos and Mitt Romney. While both have a connection to the state and both are successful businessmen, they both have the charisma of Kristen Stewart--which is to say none at all. While Romney has the whole Mormon thing people don't talk about too loudly but you know is in the back of their minds, de Vos's handicap is that his successful business was Amway.
A lot of de Vos's energy then was spent defending Amway in the same way Romney's had to spend energy defending his Bain Capital days. Exporting jobs to China was a big thing in both cases.
Anyway, between the lack of relatability because of his wealth and lack of natural charm and the whole Amway connection, what should have been a slam-dunk became a fairly large loss. I think it boiled down to while people didn't like Granholm, the alternative wasn't any better.
For my part I decided to just wash my hands of the whole thing. I voted for the Libertarian candidate because I didn't like Granholm but I didn't like de Vos either. So screw 'em both was my thought. Then no matter who won I could still complain about it, right?
The point of this is that I think a lot of the same thing is happening nationally in 2012. A lot of people don't really like the job Obama is doing (I am not one of those) but they don't see the alternative as any better. I read in a Yahoo! article that 75% of people surveyed found Romney unrelatable, versus 60% for Obama. So obviously Americans don't like either guy all that much but they dislike Romney more for all the reasons I gave above.
The "47% speech" that came out this week has not helped the situation for the Romney camp. When people already think you're a rich snob it's not good to get caught calling 47% of the country a bunch of freeloaders.
Unlike some pundits I don't think the 47% video is going to sink Romney right away, but it's just another piece of a damning puzzle of failure. It's part of the likability issue that is going to continue to plague him no matter how many diners he goes to without a tie and how often he has his wife say nice things about him. In the end politics in the 21st Century are as much about image as anything, something that helped Obama the first time and George W in 2000 and 2004 and it's really hard to change your image with seven weeks left to go.
Just as an addendum it's kind of funny that while de Vos lost in 2006 the next Michigan governor, Rick Snyder, had a lot of the same attributes, except no connection to Amway. But what he did right was to start off with the goofy "It's Time for a Nerd" commercials in 2010. Those were kind of funny and helped him avoid the likability pitfall de Vos fell into, even though I don't think Snyder is any more charismatic. Showing a sense of humor would probably help Romney more in these final weeks. And maybe do a tearful interview on Fox "News" about whatever trauma a rich white guy faces. "And then I found out the wine was only from 1965, not 1905, boo hoo hoo!" "And then I realized the maid had shrunk my silk boxers right before the horse show, sob sob sob!"
Here, I'm going to reassure Michael Offutt about who I'm voting for:
![]() |
Yes that's my car. Like I say the good thing about the magnet is I can take it off after the election easily. |
Monday is still more Phony Photo Phun...
Friday, September 14, 2012
Insane Rambling & A Beauty Contest
My insanity reached new heights a couple weeks ago when I got a new scanner/copier/color printer (thanks Amazon!) and some photo paper from Wal-Mart. I needed something to test the photo paper on so just for grins I decided to print out one of my character portraits from the Sims 2. And actually they don't look half-bad. They look better on 4x6 paper than the 8x10 just because there's less pixelation.
Anyway, looking at this, what really annoyed me about what I printed out were the eyebrows. They looked like she had caterpillars glued to her forehead. So then I thought, "Why don't I go download better ones?" Hurm...
So I went to the one website to download some non-caterpillar-looking eyebrows and remade the character I'd printed, who looks pretty awesome, at least I think.
Then I got to thinking, why haven't I ever bothered to create a new Emma Earl Sim based on all the spiffy new stuff I downloaded? Yeah, really, how could I forget something like that?
OK, so now for the beauty contest portion. Which Emma do you prefer:
The original model:
Or new, possibly improved Emma?
And while I'm at it, which Stacey Chance do you think looks better? This one with caterpillar eyebrows and longer hair:
Or the new, possibly improved Stacey?
Vote now!
You know I was actually thinking I should go work up a bunch of these and find some art gallery to post them as like an art show. It's better than a lot of "art" I've seen hung in galleries. I mean at least my portraits are vaguely real-looking and not just a line on a canvas or soup cans painted funny colors. Take that, modern art! First though I might just post a bunch on another blog. Maybe I could even let you people vote for your favorites. Not that you will, but you could. I'm just saying.
(I need to get more sleep.)
The next post, barring any more insane rambling, will be Tuesday!
Anyway, looking at this, what really annoyed me about what I printed out were the eyebrows. They looked like she had caterpillars glued to her forehead. So then I thought, "Why don't I go download better ones?" Hurm...
So I went to the one website to download some non-caterpillar-looking eyebrows and remade the character I'd printed, who looks pretty awesome, at least I think.
Then I got to thinking, why haven't I ever bothered to create a new Emma Earl Sim based on all the spiffy new stuff I downloaded? Yeah, really, how could I forget something like that?
OK, so now for the beauty contest portion. Which Emma do you prefer:
The original model:
![]() |
Original Emma |
![]() |
New, possibly improved Emma! |
And while I'm at it, which Stacey Chance do you think looks better? This one with caterpillar eyebrows and longer hair:
Or the new, possibly improved Stacey?
![]() |
New, possibly improved Stacey! |
Vote now!
You know I was actually thinking I should go work up a bunch of these and find some art gallery to post them as like an art show. It's better than a lot of "art" I've seen hung in galleries. I mean at least my portraits are vaguely real-looking and not just a line on a canvas or soup cans painted funny colors. Take that, modern art! First though I might just post a bunch on another blog. Maybe I could even let you people vote for your favorites. Not that you will, but you could. I'm just saying.
(I need to get more sleep.)
The next post, barring any more insane rambling, will be Tuesday!
Friday, September 7, 2012
Guest Post: The Grumpy Bulldog: It's Not Just About ME
With the two political conventions the last two weeks I can't resist doing a political post, despite that I promised myself not to rant about politics on this blog. So sue me. Anyway, it's time now for my alter-ego the Grumpy Bulldog to come out of the doghouse with some political thoughts.
#
During the Republican convention, Mitt Romney and his cronies tried to draw back on that old Reagan line of "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" (This despite that the only similarity between Reagan and Romney is dyeing their hair.) Then the Democrats took up that question and people took to Twitter with hash tags and stuff.
Is the Grumpy Bulldog better off than 4 years ago? NO! I mean besides time's continual march onward making me older, balder, and fatter, I'm not really better off than four years ago. The company I work for is going to be out of business in about two years because the UAW program I work for got axed in the last deal with GM. (Though really we'd probably have been out of business 3 years ago if Romney had gotten his way.)
So obviously I'm not better off than I was at this time in 2008. That means I have to vote for Romney, right? Um, no. See because the problem so many people have in casting their vote is thinking it's only about ME instead of what's good for America as a whole.
Republicans especially love to prey on this selfishness. There's a billboard on I-75 by Detroit that says, "Obama Supports Abortion and Gay Marriage, Do You?--Vote Republican." The implication there is that if you don't like abortion or gay marriage then you have to vote Republican. Which to me is bullshit.
OK, to be honest I don't "like" abortion. I'm not going around screaming, "Wooo, Abortions!!! Yeah, let's kill us some fetuses!!!" But I understand (thanks in large part to The Cider House Rules by John Irving) that it's a complex issue. Banning abortions for everyone just because I personally do not support them is far too simplistic for the world we live in.
As for gay marriage, why the fuck shouldn't we allow it? What, because some book from 2000 years ago maybe says it's bad? The same book that includes incest, rape, and murder to please an invisible entity? The same book where that invisible entity kills a man's family and destroys his life just to win a bet with the devil? Anyway, why should Kim Kardashian be able to marry some guy she barely knows but two guys or two girls who are in love and have known each other forever not be able to get married? How does that make sense? Or to use the somewhat cynical argument from my book Where You Belong, marriage can be fucked up no matter where your genitals are.
Besides that, neither of these issues really affect me personally. I'm not going to get any women knocked up. And I'm sure as hell not ever going to need an abortion. I'm not going to marry any dudes either. So really, why the hell should I vote for someone just because of those issues?
But to get back more to my point, I hate that people do let these kind of issues determine their vote. I especially hate when people think, "I don't like abortion, so no abortions for anyone!" Or "I don't like gays so they can't have the same rights as everyone else!" Who the hell are you to decide that for millions of other people? Get over yourself!
So that's what I'm saying when I talk about it's not just about ME and whether I'm better off or which candidate I think better reflects MY values. It's about who I think is better for everyone in America as a whole. And I think the better guy is the one who's inclusive, rather than the one who's exclusive. Because America is about freedom and if our leaders don't believe in freedom then what the hell good are they?
#
Another thing I wanted to bring up is a little historical nugget I thought of. Back during the onset of the Depression, Herbert Hoover was president. Hoover was a pro-business Republican, which was fine in the Roaring 20s but did shit for America when the stock market tanked and the economy collapsed. Hoover's response to the Depression was largely to do nothing. He touted that Americans' "rugged individualism" would pull them through. Which it obviously didn't, so they elected FDR, who believed the government should take a more active role in the situation, which actually didn't do all that much better.
Anyway, it occurred to me that the whole Tea Party thing is really a return to Hooverism. All this small government stuff they tout is the same "rugged individualism" Hoover championed. That kind of thing might sound great until you lose your job, get evicted from your home, and have to dig through garbage cans for food. Back in 1930-31 or so, people who lost their homes founded tent/shack cities they called Hoovervilles. That's rugged individualism for you. It didn't work in 1932 and it's not going to work in 2012 either.
#
Something else while I'm venting all this stuff is I went on vacation in July up to Petoskey, Michigan. (It's near the top of the mitten.) Driving around I kept seeing these bumper stickers and billboards saying, "Defend Freedom, Vote Against Obama!" To me this is just like the Birther crap, the "Obama 2016" mockumentary, and all these other conspiracy theories floating around. And I think to myself, "What has this man actually DONE to warrant that much hate?"
I mean when you say "Defend Freedom" what freedoms have been infringed in the last 3+ years? Your freedom to go bankrupt should you need a costly operation because you don't have medical insurance? I get so tired of all this paranoid "Manchurian Candidate" crap. He's a Kenyan Muslim! He's a secret Communist! He's an alien parasite from the planet Xenu! Sorry, but there's no actual, factual evidence to support any of that shit. I don't care if you're rich like Donald Trump, you still come off sounding like the paranoid guy wearing a tinfoil hat so the government can't read his thoughts. It's sad then to think these people's vote counts just as much as mine.
Strangely though all these tinfoil hat wearers don't seem to have any problem electing a guy who's a leader in a religion that believes the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, there were white Native Americans before the real Native Americans, God lives on another planet, and all the other crazy hoodoo the Mormons believe. You don't even need a tinfoil hat for that; it's a fact! (Or facts I learned from "South Park" and "Religulous" at least.) Ironically if I went about screaming about that stuff all those tinfoil hat wearers would call me a bigot. Just like if I say they're racist dolts they'd say I'm racist against white people. (That seriously happened in 2008.)
Anyway, I guess the overall point is I wish we lived in a country where people could think rationally and look at the big picture instead of coloring everything with their own prejudices.
Tuesday is still a Two-Fer, not that you care...
#
During the Republican convention, Mitt Romney and his cronies tried to draw back on that old Reagan line of "Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?" (This despite that the only similarity between Reagan and Romney is dyeing their hair.) Then the Democrats took up that question and people took to Twitter with hash tags and stuff.
Is the Grumpy Bulldog better off than 4 years ago? NO! I mean besides time's continual march onward making me older, balder, and fatter, I'm not really better off than four years ago. The company I work for is going to be out of business in about two years because the UAW program I work for got axed in the last deal with GM. (Though really we'd probably have been out of business 3 years ago if Romney had gotten his way.)
So obviously I'm not better off than I was at this time in 2008. That means I have to vote for Romney, right? Um, no. See because the problem so many people have in casting their vote is thinking it's only about ME instead of what's good for America as a whole.
Republicans especially love to prey on this selfishness. There's a billboard on I-75 by Detroit that says, "Obama Supports Abortion and Gay Marriage, Do You?--Vote Republican." The implication there is that if you don't like abortion or gay marriage then you have to vote Republican. Which to me is bullshit.
OK, to be honest I don't "like" abortion. I'm not going around screaming, "Wooo, Abortions!!! Yeah, let's kill us some fetuses!!!" But I understand (thanks in large part to The Cider House Rules by John Irving) that it's a complex issue. Banning abortions for everyone just because I personally do not support them is far too simplistic for the world we live in.
As for gay marriage, why the fuck shouldn't we allow it? What, because some book from 2000 years ago maybe says it's bad? The same book that includes incest, rape, and murder to please an invisible entity? The same book where that invisible entity kills a man's family and destroys his life just to win a bet with the devil? Anyway, why should Kim Kardashian be able to marry some guy she barely knows but two guys or two girls who are in love and have known each other forever not be able to get married? How does that make sense? Or to use the somewhat cynical argument from my book Where You Belong, marriage can be fucked up no matter where your genitals are.
Besides that, neither of these issues really affect me personally. I'm not going to get any women knocked up. And I'm sure as hell not ever going to need an abortion. I'm not going to marry any dudes either. So really, why the hell should I vote for someone just because of those issues?
But to get back more to my point, I hate that people do let these kind of issues determine their vote. I especially hate when people think, "I don't like abortion, so no abortions for anyone!" Or "I don't like gays so they can't have the same rights as everyone else!" Who the hell are you to decide that for millions of other people? Get over yourself!
So that's what I'm saying when I talk about it's not just about ME and whether I'm better off or which candidate I think better reflects MY values. It's about who I think is better for everyone in America as a whole. And I think the better guy is the one who's inclusive, rather than the one who's exclusive. Because America is about freedom and if our leaders don't believe in freedom then what the hell good are they?
#
Another thing I wanted to bring up is a little historical nugget I thought of. Back during the onset of the Depression, Herbert Hoover was president. Hoover was a pro-business Republican, which was fine in the Roaring 20s but did shit for America when the stock market tanked and the economy collapsed. Hoover's response to the Depression was largely to do nothing. He touted that Americans' "rugged individualism" would pull them through. Which it obviously didn't, so they elected FDR, who believed the government should take a more active role in the situation, which actually didn't do all that much better.
Anyway, it occurred to me that the whole Tea Party thing is really a return to Hooverism. All this small government stuff they tout is the same "rugged individualism" Hoover championed. That kind of thing might sound great until you lose your job, get evicted from your home, and have to dig through garbage cans for food. Back in 1930-31 or so, people who lost their homes founded tent/shack cities they called Hoovervilles. That's rugged individualism for you. It didn't work in 1932 and it's not going to work in 2012 either.
#
Something else while I'm venting all this stuff is I went on vacation in July up to Petoskey, Michigan. (It's near the top of the mitten.) Driving around I kept seeing these bumper stickers and billboards saying, "Defend Freedom, Vote Against Obama!" To me this is just like the Birther crap, the "Obama 2016" mockumentary, and all these other conspiracy theories floating around. And I think to myself, "What has this man actually DONE to warrant that much hate?"
I mean when you say "Defend Freedom" what freedoms have been infringed in the last 3+ years? Your freedom to go bankrupt should you need a costly operation because you don't have medical insurance? I get so tired of all this paranoid "Manchurian Candidate" crap. He's a Kenyan Muslim! He's a secret Communist! He's an alien parasite from the planet Xenu! Sorry, but there's no actual, factual evidence to support any of that shit. I don't care if you're rich like Donald Trump, you still come off sounding like the paranoid guy wearing a tinfoil hat so the government can't read his thoughts. It's sad then to think these people's vote counts just as much as mine.
Strangely though all these tinfoil hat wearers don't seem to have any problem electing a guy who's a leader in a religion that believes the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, there were white Native Americans before the real Native Americans, God lives on another planet, and all the other crazy hoodoo the Mormons believe. You don't even need a tinfoil hat for that; it's a fact! (Or facts I learned from "South Park" and "Religulous" at least.) Ironically if I went about screaming about that stuff all those tinfoil hat wearers would call me a bigot. Just like if I say they're racist dolts they'd say I'm racist against white people. (That seriously happened in 2008.)
Anyway, I guess the overall point is I wish we lived in a country where people could think rationally and look at the big picture instead of coloring everything with their own prejudices.
Tuesday is still a Two-Fer, not that you care...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)