George Clooney might have tepidly won the box office but this week The Rock will be #1. Because he's the fucking Rock, OK? The guy who turned the "Fast & Furious" franchise from on life support to a billion-dollar industry, all apologies to Vin Diesel and the late Paul Walker.
What's the Rock doing? Who cares! It's the Rock! Actually it's an old-school disaster movie called "San Andreas." The Big One finally hits and the Rock has to do stuff. Do people even still talk about "The Big One" anymore? I think lately they talk more about the constant drought in California. Which maybe the Rock can do something about that. Use his muscles to construct William Shatner's $30 billion pipeline?
Anyway, I hate disaster movies so I won't be watching this, but you will. Because it's the Rock!!!
And if you have a wife or girlfriend, they'll probably go drag you to see, "Aloha" some sappy Cameron Crowe movie with Bradley Cooper, Rachel McAdams, and Emma Stone. The description says, "A celebrated military contractor returns to the site of his greatest
career triumphs and re-connects with a long-ago love while unexpectedly
falling for the hard-charging Air Force watchdog assigned to him" Good luck with that, fellas. I feel your pain.
Friday, May 29, 2015
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Writing Wednesday: Imitiaton Is the Sincerest Form of Flattery or Ain't Life a Bitch?
As a long-time reviewer of crap on Amazon and Vine Voice(tm) and Amazon Prime member and stuff like that, I get offered free shit sometimes. Like once a month Amazon picks out 4 of their upcoming books to offer for free on Kindle and I can download two. I've done that a few times and the books usually suck.
Anyway, one of April's selections was called Boundary Crossed, which sounded like generic urban fantasy crap I have no interest in. I was curious if it was about vampires or witches or angels or mermaids or what (vampires) and the first part of the description is this:
Anyway, did you ever see that movie Sliding Doors where Gwyneth Paltrow is racing to catch a subway train or something and they show two different outcomes, one where she makes it and one where she doesn't? I think it's the version where she makes the train that turns out happy. Or maybe not. That's kind of how the writing world can work. I mean, have you ever written something and then two weeks later you see a book or movie that's pretty much the same thing? Like in 1995 I wrote a book called First Contact and the next year Star Trek: First Contact comes out!
The point being two writers have two different books with similar opening sentences. One book gets published by Amazon with all the marketing hoopla. The other...not so much. It's certainly not that the one book is bad and the other is good. It's just that sometimes Fate is bullshit and you aren't at the right place at the right time.
The worst part is knowing there isn't shit you can do about it--except maybe throw more vampires in your book.
Anyway, one of April's selections was called Boundary Crossed, which sounded like generic urban fantasy crap I have no interest in. I was curious if it was about vampires or witches or angels or mermaids or what (vampires) and the first part of the description is this:
"The third time I died was early on a Monday morning, a week after Labor Day." As opening sentences go, that one is nothing less than awesome. I was hooked.And I thought, hey that first line seems really familiar. I've read something like that before. I racked my brain for a couple of minutes and then went to check out a book on Amazon. And yup, here's the opening line:
"Last night I died for the third time this week..."That book is of course Oculus by Michael Offutt. It was published in 2011, 4 years earlier! I'm not saying it's plagiarism or anything, but it is a big coincidence. And really Editor Person of the other book, I have to say Mr. Offutt's sentence is better. It's a lot less bulky. I mean the other sentence is a passive sentence whereas the one in Oculus is far more direct and active. But hey, I guess that editor is blown away by passive sentences.
Anyway, did you ever see that movie Sliding Doors where Gwyneth Paltrow is racing to catch a subway train or something and they show two different outcomes, one where she makes it and one where she doesn't? I think it's the version where she makes the train that turns out happy. Or maybe not. That's kind of how the writing world can work. I mean, have you ever written something and then two weeks later you see a book or movie that's pretty much the same thing? Like in 1995 I wrote a book called First Contact and the next year Star Trek: First Contact comes out!
The point being two writers have two different books with similar opening sentences. One book gets published by Amazon with all the marketing hoopla. The other...not so much. It's certainly not that the one book is bad and the other is good. It's just that sometimes Fate is bullshit and you aren't at the right place at the right time.
The worst part is knowing there isn't shit you can do about it--except maybe throw more vampires in your book.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Another Year, Another Creepy Calendar!
It's Memorial Day, so who cares about blogs? Anyway, by the time I finally got a place to live, my previous year's calendar was out of date, so eventually I decided to make a new one. As I have for the last few years, I thought I'd go to Shutterfly and make a calendar of my Sims.
Predictably I used my Transformed series of stories as a basis for this year, with a few extras thrown in since I ordered it for 18 months (starting in May) so it'll be good for a while. So here are the pictures:
Transformed Into a Little Girl
Transformed Into a Schoolgirl
Transformed Into a Whore
Transformed Into a Geek Girl
Transformed Into a Dominatrix
Transformed Into a Goth Girl
Transformed Into a MILF
Transformed Into a Bimbo
Transformed Into a Cougar
Transformed Into a Bride
Transformed Into a Pregnant Girl
Transformed Into a Maid
Transformed Into an Asian Girl
[Not created: Transformed Into a Fat Girl. I'm a jerk like that.]
A couple other ones included:
Transformed for Spring/Summer:
One Year As A Virgin:
Perfect Worlds:
Girl Power Series:
Another Chance:
Another awesome year of creepy Sims!
The great thing is next year I can make a Sims 4 calendar! Plus I get to torment you with Sims 4 pictures the rest of the year. So far it's OK. It's nice that it takes less time to load but I'm really pissed they took away the recolor feature on clothes, hair, etc. Typical of EA to take away perfectly good features for no fucking reason, just as they always did with the NHL series of games when I used to play those. Anyway, here's a first look at a Sims 4 Stacey Chance:
And here's the main character of the book I'm working on now, kind of a before-and-after:
Predictably I used my Transformed series of stories as a basis for this year, with a few extras thrown in since I ordered it for 18 months (starting in May) so it'll be good for a while. So here are the pictures:
Transformed Into a Little Girl
Transformed Into a Schoolgirl
Transformed Into a Whore
Transformed Into a Geek Girl
Transformed Into a Dominatrix
Transformed Into a Goth Girl
Transformed Into a MILF
Transformed Into a Bimbo
Transformed Into a Cougar
Transformed Into a Bride
Transformed Into a Pregnant Girl
Transformed Into a Maid
Transformed Into an Asian Girl
[Not created: Transformed Into a Fat Girl. I'm a jerk like that.]
A couple other ones included:
Transformed for Spring/Summer:
One Year As A Virgin:
Perfect Worlds:
Girl Power Series:
Boob panel! |
Another Chance:
Another awesome year of creepy Sims!
The great thing is next year I can make a Sims 4 calendar! Plus I get to torment you with Sims 4 pictures the rest of the year. So far it's OK. It's nice that it takes less time to load but I'm really pissed they took away the recolor feature on clothes, hair, etc. Typical of EA to take away perfectly good features for no fucking reason, just as they always did with the NHL series of games when I used to play those. Anyway, here's a first look at a Sims 4 Stacey Chance:
And here's the main character of the book I'm working on now, kind of a before-and-after:
Friday, May 22, 2015
Movies! 5/22/15
It's nice Disney gave themselves 3 weeks between "Avengers 2" and "Tomorrowland." I mean it'd be kind of stupid for them to compete against themselves, right?
Apparently "Tomorrowland" is directed by Brad Bird who did "The Incredibles" among other things like "The Simpsons" and stars George Clooney. The description on IMDB says, "Bound by a shared destiny, a teen bursting with scientific curiosity and a former boy-genius inventor embark on a mission to unearth the secrets of a place somewhere in time and space that exists in their collective memory."
Personally, my flop detector has been going off since I heard of this. I mean it's about George Clooney and some kid going to find old-timey sci-fi land? Yeah, that's going to go over real well with today's youth. Like about as well as "John Carter." Which if you'll recall the only reason Disney's film division didn't get wiped out in 2012 thanks to "John Carter" was "Avengers 1." So I guess they figure with #2 having made a billion dollars already they're playing with house money as far as this goes.
America might prove me wrong, but I think it's a concept that just won't catch on with the average popcorn-shoveling 13-year-old boy who drives the movie industry.
I think the only serious threat is "Poltergeist," the remake of the 80s horror movie, though most people probably remember the "Family Guy" spoof better. I never saw the original all the way through. I saw the lame third one that took place in Chicago's Hancock Building. That was pretty damned lame. Probably as lame as this remake will be. Yet because it's horror (and a name brand!) people might go watch it.
Do you suppose though that the House of Mouse/Ideas should be concerned that Avengers 2 dropped to #3 after three weeks? And got its butt kicked by "Pitch Perfect 2?" Maybe the gravy train is starting to slow down.
Apparently "Tomorrowland" is directed by Brad Bird who did "The Incredibles" among other things like "The Simpsons" and stars George Clooney. The description on IMDB says, "Bound by a shared destiny, a teen bursting with scientific curiosity and a former boy-genius inventor embark on a mission to unearth the secrets of a place somewhere in time and space that exists in their collective memory."
Personally, my flop detector has been going off since I heard of this. I mean it's about George Clooney and some kid going to find old-timey sci-fi land? Yeah, that's going to go over real well with today's youth. Like about as well as "John Carter." Which if you'll recall the only reason Disney's film division didn't get wiped out in 2012 thanks to "John Carter" was "Avengers 1." So I guess they figure with #2 having made a billion dollars already they're playing with house money as far as this goes.
America might prove me wrong, but I think it's a concept that just won't catch on with the average popcorn-shoveling 13-year-old boy who drives the movie industry.
I think the only serious threat is "Poltergeist," the remake of the 80s horror movie, though most people probably remember the "Family Guy" spoof better. I never saw the original all the way through. I saw the lame third one that took place in Chicago's Hancock Building. That was pretty damned lame. Probably as lame as this remake will be. Yet because it's horror (and a name brand!) people might go watch it.
Do you suppose though that the House of Mouse/Ideas should be concerned that Avengers 2 dropped to #3 after three weeks? And got its butt kicked by "Pitch Perfect 2?" Maybe the gravy train is starting to slow down.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
Writing Wednesday: Disproportionate Responses
There's that old saying that the punishment should fit the crime. In books, TV, movies, etc that's not always the case, is it? Think of that famous Twilight Zone episode with Burgess Meredith where he survives a nuclear blast in a bank vault because he went down there to read so no one would give him shit about it. Now the last man on Earth (or his neck of the woods) he finds a bunch of books and gleefully says, "There's time now! All the books I want!" And then his glasses fall off and the lenses break. D'OH! I always feel bad because really what did the poor guy do to be tortured like that? He just wanted to read some goddamned books.
A bad review for my book My Wife Changed Me Into a Pinup Girl was titled, "he loved her, so she tortured him." A succinct, albeit inaccurate way to describe the plot. I described the plot in my P A to Z Challenge post. The gist is that an old woman gets a couple of magic crystals and uses them to turn her husband into a 60s pinup girl he had been ogling in an antiques shop.
Now is being turned into a sexy young woman really a proportionate response for him checking out a hot chick on an old magazine cover? I don't think anyone would say that it is. Then again is going from a 70-something-year-old guy to that girl on the cover really such a punishment? We should all be "tortured" like that.
Admittedly after that the wife lets her newfound power go to her head a bit and does a few other things to the husband to act out some naughty bedroom fantasies. You could think of it as releasing 30 years of pent-up sexual frustration. Still, probably not a proportionate response.
I can think of two other recent responses. In another bad review, someone complained about my book Transformed Into a Pregnant Girl that the nasty woman who turned her boyfriend into a pregnant girl didn't show him any mercy. To which my response would be, well he did kinda strangle her to death. So, you know, you die and make a deal with the devil to come back to life, you might not be in the most forgiving mood either.
A more recent example would be Transformed for Mother's Day. Every year Joe's wife gets super-duper pissed-off on Mother's Day because she can't have any babies. So this year Joe decides he's going to sneak out for a little fishing before she can wake up. That's when she reveals that she's a witch and decides to make Joe into her cute daughter Jo to have the perfect Mother's Day.
Does ditching your wife on Mother's Day really deserve being turned into a young girl and forced to do things like make her breakfast in bed and pictures out of macaroni and glitter? Yeah, probably not.
But then if characters were all sane and rational, where would you get any drama? If Burgess Meredith can just sit around reading books, then where's the message about Man's folly in destroying himself with nuclear weapons?
Sometimes you just have to go nuclear.
A bad review for my book My Wife Changed Me Into a Pinup Girl was titled, "he loved her, so she tortured him." A succinct, albeit inaccurate way to describe the plot. I described the plot in my P A to Z Challenge post. The gist is that an old woman gets a couple of magic crystals and uses them to turn her husband into a 60s pinup girl he had been ogling in an antiques shop.
Now is being turned into a sexy young woman really a proportionate response for him checking out a hot chick on an old magazine cover? I don't think anyone would say that it is. Then again is going from a 70-something-year-old guy to that girl on the cover really such a punishment? We should all be "tortured" like that.
Admittedly after that the wife lets her newfound power go to her head a bit and does a few other things to the husband to act out some naughty bedroom fantasies. You could think of it as releasing 30 years of pent-up sexual frustration. Still, probably not a proportionate response.
I can think of two other recent responses. In another bad review, someone complained about my book Transformed Into a Pregnant Girl that the nasty woman who turned her boyfriend into a pregnant girl didn't show him any mercy. To which my response would be, well he did kinda strangle her to death. So, you know, you die and make a deal with the devil to come back to life, you might not be in the most forgiving mood either.
A more recent example would be Transformed for Mother's Day. Every year Joe's wife gets super-duper pissed-off on Mother's Day because she can't have any babies. So this year Joe decides he's going to sneak out for a little fishing before she can wake up. That's when she reveals that she's a witch and decides to make Joe into her cute daughter Jo to have the perfect Mother's Day.
Does ditching your wife on Mother's Day really deserve being turned into a young girl and forced to do things like make her breakfast in bed and pictures out of macaroni and glitter? Yeah, probably not.
But then if characters were all sane and rational, where would you get any drama? If Burgess Meredith can just sit around reading books, then where's the message about Man's folly in destroying himself with nuclear weapons?
Sometimes you just have to go nuclear.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)